He raised several points of error, including a claim that his Sixth Amendmentright to counsel was violated because he received ineffective assistance of counsel whenhis attorney fell asleep while Muniz was being cross-examined by the government.Id.at *4-5. The court rejected all of Muniz’s claims of error and affirmed the judgment.Id.at *5. It also declined to remand his ineffective assistance claim for an evidentiaryhearing, holding Muniz “ha[d] not established that an evidentiary hearing to substantiatehis position [was] warranted.”Michigan Supreme Court. Id. Muniz subsequently was denied leave to appeal by thePeople v. Muniz, 726 N.W.2d 18 (Mich. 2007).
31 July 2011
Different Rules for different people
Did your attorney fall asleep during your criminal trial? Tough shit.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment