Showing posts with label SCIENCE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SCIENCE. Show all posts

16 January 2012

Liberate tutatme... ex inferis

Could they have picked a better name?

"Even five years ago, such a proposal would not have seemed credible," added Sheperd Doeleman, assistant director of the Haystack Observatory at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), who is the principal investigator of the Event Horizon Telescope, as the project is dubbed. "Now we have the technological means to take a stab at it."

Surely there's a better name for this than the same name as the creepy Sam Neill movie, right?

The face of science...

30 December 2011

Fear the Future! (Pandemic Edition)

I can think of few ways I'd rather die than Bird Flu.  Something that sounds so damnably cute has to be awesome, right?  I mean, BIRD FLU? Who names these diseases?  I would have called it "bloody genitals."  Maybe the disease doesn't actually involve bloody genitals, but it would sure as hell sound a lot scarier than "bird flu."

Here's a tip, science guys: Birds Are Not Scary.  Mr. Hitchcock helped us resolve our fear of them through exposure therapy.

Also? I'm no longer afraid of homicidal transvestites.  Thanks, Mr. Hitchcock!

26 December 2011

Paging Roger Corman...

You have a telephone call at the front desk, long distance from Florida.


The mosquitoes are genetically modified with a gene designed to kill them unless given an antibiotic known as tetracycline. Offspring of the GM mosquitoes will receive this same lethal gene which will kill the offspring before it can ever reach adulthood. As more genetically modified mosquitoes mate with wild mosquitoes, the idea is that more and more offspring will be produced with the lethal gene, thereby reducing the mosquito population.


I blame it on the younger generation; no one likes watching instructional videos like "The Wasp Woman" anymore. Lazy shits.


25 December 2011

Where everybody knows your name

Making your way in the world today, takes everything you got.
Taking a break from all your worries, sure would help a lot.
Wouldn't you like to get away?
Sometimes you wanna go, where everybody knows your name.

Remember: the goal here is fear, not confusion. And that fear can only remain effective as long as the intended audience understands what they’re supposed to be afraid of. 
No, just because this is my mantra while getting dressed for work every night, the article is about Magneto, and I'm not 100% sure I've shared this site with you people and figured that needed to be corrected.

Also, I want to be part of the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants.

I'd even consider spandex, but probably not.

23 December 2011

No ulcers for me, bitches!

Because I like to bite the other rats


Numerous psychoendocrine studies show that in a stressful or frustrating circumstance, the magnitude of the subsequent stress-repsonse is decreased if the organism is provided with an outlet for frustration. For example, the (glucocorticoid) secretion triggered by electric shock in a rat is diminished if the rat is provided with a bar of wood to gnaw on, a running wheel, or, as one of the most effective outlets, access to another rat to bite.

20 December 2011

Welcome to the bughouse

In discussing the idea that all of us are crazy to a certain extent, Geoffrey Miller reveals his naivete:

It remains to be seen whether DSM-5 is written for the convenience of American insurers and FDA officials, or for international scientific accuracy.

Why on Earth would it write something that would incovenience the people who pay for it?  Scientific accuracy be damned, the insurance companies are going to get what they want.


To be fair, there probably are bugs on you, though.

23 October 2011

Scientists: they're just messing with us, right?

Quick! How many planets are there in our solar system?  Got an answer?  You are probably quite wrong.

Hey, brainiacs, let's pull it together, allright?  People are watching you, and you look retarded.

Now, quit fucking around and build my god damned time machine, asshole.

25 September 2011

This is why Fox News is my go to site for Sciency type stuff...

Anti-Magnets!

X-Men’s Magneto isn’t the only who can shield magnetic fields.

What the fuck does this even mean?  I won't get into whether or not Magneto should be labelled as part of the X-men (and technically, he WAS their headmaster for a while) but this is just stupid.
Spanish researchers have designed what they call the world's first "anti-magnet," a magnetic cloak that can act as a shield they envision helping the military and saving lives. For example, some types of mines in the ocean are set to detonate upon detection of magnetic fields from ships passing above them. Military ships could use an anti-magnet to stop their magnetic fields from tripping the mines.

They already do, it's called degaussing.  It's been around for a while.

“It was a big explosion in science [in 2008] -- the possibility of cloaking electromagnetic waves,” professor Alvar Sanchez from from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona in Spain and the lead author of the design told FoxNews.com. “So we came up with the idea of trying to make something similar with magnetic fields, and now we have come up with a device we hope can be constructed eventually that will have these properties of an anti-magnet.”

Wait, you haven't even built the damn thing?  What is this story about, then?  "Oh hey, I've got this theory about a thing that might do some stuff we already do some other way, but we haven't built it." 

I'll bet almost anything this is being done to get funding from the Germans.  We all know that they're the only ones with any money in Europe, so Queen Isabella, or whoever the fuck is in charge of Spain probably said, "What can we do to drum up sthome cash?" (Sthpaniardsth sthpeak with a listhp, you sthee...) Some science-like type says "Ooh, I know! Letsth sthee if we can sthcam the Germansth.  They don't know anything about sthcience, right?  To make it sthound legitimate, letsth get a newsth sthathion to cover it..."

24 August 2011

Fusioneer

Remember the Radioactive Boy Scout?  That guy was an amateur.  This kid is not only scary, but kind of awesome in a Rocketship Galileo, Nazi-hunters on the moon kind of way. Also, his teachers apparently have little to no fear of mutants.

“I said, ‘Whoa, wait a minute. You’re going to irradiate your parents, and maybe the whole neighborhood,’” recalls Ochs. “I suggested he build it somewhere safe, like a university.”

23 August 2011

Fear the Future, the very NEAR future...

Aw... isn't it cute? They let the robot tweet.  The big question, to my mind at least, is how are you going to fit your demands for world domination into 140 characters?

Second question?  Who decided to put a killer robot in a tin can with our most expensive humans ever?  Nice move, international space community.  This is why you can't have nice things.

Also, has anyone thought to program these into the evil machine?
  
0.  A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

22 August 2011

Black Death Exonerations

In another example of why I like archaeologists more than most all other social scientists, Archaeologists have now exonerated rats for their alleged part in the spread of the black death.

"The evidence just isn't there to support it," said Barney Sloane, author of The Black Death in London. "We ought to be finding great heaps of dead rats in all the waterfront sites but they just aren't there. And all the evidence I've looked at suggests the plague spread too fast for the traditional explanation of transmission by rats and fleas. It has to be person to person – there just isn't time for the rats to be spreading it."

I'm pleased by this, not because I'm a fan of rats, though they've never done me any wrong.  The reason I'm pleased is that archaeologists are taking new data about something that was thought to be a closed case and using that new data to refine their conclusions, rather than the other way around.  It's the way things are supposed to work in the world of scientific inquiry.

Mortality continued to rise throughout the bitterly cold winter, when fleas could not have survived, and there is no evidence of enough rats.
Black rat skeletons have been found at 14th-century sites, but not in high enough numbers to make them the plague carriers, he said.

To re-iterate my point: scientists found evidence to exonerate two of the most hated pests in history of one of the worst disasters to hit human kind, and changed their conclusions rather than explaining it away.  This is  more amazing than I can say (and how sad is it that rational behavior on the part of scientists is impressive?).